How the Trial of an Army Veteran Over the 1972 Londonderry Incident Ended in Acquittal
January 30th, 1972 is remembered as one of the deadliest – and consequential – dates in multiple decades of violence in this area.
Throughout the area where it happened – the memories of Bloody Sunday are displayed on the buildings and embedded in people's minds.
A protest demonstration was conducted on a wintry, sunny afternoon in Derry.
The protest was challenging the policy of imprisonment without charges – detaining individuals without trial – which had been put in place after multiple years of conflict.
Troops from the specialized division killed multiple civilians in the district – which was, and remains, a overwhelmingly nationalist population.
A particular photograph became particularly iconic.
Pictures showed a religious figure, Father Daly, using a bloodied cloth in his effort to defend a group moving a young man, the injured teenager, who had been killed.
Media personnel documented extensive video on the day.
Historical records features the priest telling a reporter that military personnel "just seemed to shoot indiscriminately" and he was "completely sure" that there was no justification for the discharge of weapons.
That version of events wasn't accepted by the original examination.
The first investigation concluded the soldiers had been fired upon initially.
During the resolution efforts, the ruling party commissioned another inquiry, following pressure by surviving kin, who said the first investigation had been a whitewash.
During 2010, the findings by Lord Saville said that generally, the military personnel had fired first and that not one of the individuals had presented danger.
The contemporary Prime Minister, the Prime Minister, apologised in the government chamber – declaring killings were "unjustified and unjustifiable."
Authorities began to examine the matter.
One former paratrooper, identified as Soldier F, was brought to trial for homicide.
Accusations were made concerning the deaths of James Wray, 22, and in his mid-twenties the second individual.
Soldier F was further implicated of trying to kill Patrick O'Donnell, additional persons, more people, an additional individual, and an unknown person.
Exists a judicial decision preserving the defendant's privacy, which his lawyers have claimed is necessary because he is at risk of attack.
He told the investigation that he had only fired at persons who were possessing firearms.
The statement was disputed in the official findings.
Information from the examination could not be used directly as evidence in the legal proceedings.
During the trial, the accused was hidden from public using a privacy screen.
He addressed the court for the initial occasion in court at a session in December 2024, to answer "innocent" when the allegations were presented.
Kin of those who were killed on Bloody Sunday travelled from the city to the judicial building daily of the trial.
One relative, whose relative was killed, said they were aware that listening to the trial would be emotional.
"I visualize the events in my recollection," John said, as we walked around the primary sites discussed in the case – from the street, where his brother was fatally wounded, to the adjacent the area, where James Wray and another victim were killed.
"It returns me to my position that day.
"I participated in moving Michael and place him in the vehicle.
"I experienced again each detail during the proceedings.
"But even with experiencing all that – it's still meaningful for me."